Stress · Ingredient guide

Passionflower

Passiflora extracts are studied for anxiety and sleep with small, heterogeneous trials.

Compare
Evidence strengthLimited evidence
Based on consistency, quality and relevance of human research—not podcast mentions.
Common research protocol250–500 mg extract in small studies
Protocols mapped1 goal-specific protocol
Evidence reviewed throughSeptember 2026
Evidence verdict

Limited evidence for the stated context. Extracts, doses and comparators vary too much for a firm protocol.

Scientific evidence1 reviewed sourceDetermines the evidence grade
Expert & media context0 reviewed sourcesDoes not change the grade alone
01

What it is & primary uses

Passiflora extracts are studied for anxiety and sleep with small, heterogeneous trials.

Anxiety-symptom researchSleep researchRelaxation
02

Main benefits

  • Small studies suggest possible anxiety or sleep benefits.
  • Extracts, doses and comparators vary too much for a firm protocol.
03

Studied protocols

Research doses are grouped by outcome. They describe study designs—not a personal prescription.

Anxiety-symptom research

250–500 mg extract in small studies

Very low confidence
Study duration
Commonly 4–12 weeks; protocol and outcome vary
Interpretation
Extracts, doses and comparators vary too much for a firm protocol.
04Food sources & equivalents
Food sources & equivalents

Can food provide a studied amount?

Direct ingredient
Comparison target250–500 mg extract in small studies

Passionflower herb or tea can provide related dietary exposure, but food and extract milligrams are not automatically interchangeable.

Passionflower herb or teaFood amount varies

Dietary exposure; verify composition before comparing with a studied supplement dose

How this was estimated
Dose Radar compares the declared active ingredient with official composition data or the studied standardized extract—not with marketing names.
Important limitation
Natural content, preparation, bioavailability and formulation vary. This comparison does not prove equal physiological effect.

Food equivalents compare ingredient mass using published composition values. They do not prove equal absorption, formulation, physiological effect, safety or personal need.

Source: Passionflower: current human evidence index ↗
05How to take it for absorption & tolerance
Meal relationship

With or without food

Evidence-informed
With or without food; formulation and tolerance remain part of the comparison.

Human research has not established a universally superior fed or fasted protocol for this ingredient.

Practical approach
Evening or before an acute stressor. Keep the formulation and daily total consistent with the evidence context shown above.
Watch for
Sedatives

Meal guidance reflects human pharmacokinetic, clinical, official-label or evidence-review sources where available. A food pairing can change absorption or tolerability, but does not make a supplement necessary, effective or safe for every person.

Source: Passionflower: current human evidence index ↗
06Supplement interaction check
Library interaction context156 ingredients · 0 mapped signals for this guide

An unlisted pair means no established pair-specific interaction was identified in this review—not proof that every dose, product or person is safe.

No pair-specific signal listedNo established interaction with another Dose Radar ingredient was identified in this review.

This is not proof that every dose, product or user context is safe. Medication and condition checks still apply.

07Research notes
Evidence verdict

Limited evidence for the stated context. Extracts, doses and comparators vary too much for a firm protocol.

The displayed amount comes from human research or an official evidence summary. It is not a personalized prescription, and formulation can change whether the comparison is valid.

TimingEvening or before an acute stressor
Time to expected effectStudy-specific; commonly several weeks
08Scientific references
09Expert & media references
Context sourceUsed to understand what professionals discuss

Podcast and practitioner statements are clearly separated from research. They may explain practice or emerging ideas, but do not prove efficacy.

0 reviewed context sourcesNo verified expert or media reference mapped yet.

Dose Radar will leave this lane empty rather than invent or infer a professional opinion.